Thread:Unok/@comment-1430822-20160415034923/@comment-3544775-20160415091632

Yes, its using the old infoboxes, because the new ones look lame and you have to put lots of efforts to change the new into something close to the current. The current one is also mobile friendly. Avoiding style? Why?

1. I'm aware of that possibility, but as I have been on multiple wikis too, I noticed that people rarely categorize their images. Especially in not so active wikis, which don't have regular editors.

2. Also aware of that, but that can create some rare cases, which we wouldn't need as category. Like: "Human (former), Kabane (current)" or "Half-Kabane/Half-Human". At least I had a issue with that on another wiki, so I'm fine with manual categorization, especially when there isn't infinity number of characters that are added here.